The new lawsuits ask the courts to declare that this law “precludes any finding of liability” against MGM. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and can limit liability after attacks. The lawsuits are not seeking money but instead are asking courts to agree that under federal law, any claims from the rampage “must be dismissed.” The company’s argument is that it is shielded from lawsuits by a federal law known as the SAFETY Act, which was passed in the wake of the Sept.
“While we expected the litigation that followed, we also feel strongly that victims and the community should be able to recover and find resolution in a timely manner.” “From the day of this tragedy, we have focused on the recovery of those impacted by the despicable act of one evil individual,” Debra DeShong, spokesperson for MGM Resorts, said in a statement. The complaints state they were filed against people who say they were injured and live in those states. District Court for the Central District of California. District Court for the District of Nevada and another in the U.S. The company filed one lawsuit in the U.S. MGM Resorts International, which owns the Mandalay Bay, said its filings were intended to seek a “timely resolution” for people affected.
